How do we make sure that AI-driven recruitment processes bring added value both to businesses and candidates?

Applying for jobs nowadays can be a frustrating experience. Increasingly, candidates find that their résumés alone are no longer enough to secure an interview.


They are expected to complete time-consuming assessments before they get a chance to make their case in person to a prospective employer.


While these assessments range in style, they usually share one feature: the gatekeeper deciding between success and failure is a computer, not a human. What does this mean for businesses and candidates?



Why companies use AI in recruitment


With technology increasingly revolutionising every aspect of our economy and lives, it is no surprise that more and more companies are using automated systems to help them with the recruitment process. To save time, they often use algorithms to filter large pools of applications down to more manageable shortlists.

Photo by Johanna Buguet on Unsplash

Algorithms are also able to scour job boards and platforms like LinkedIn to find suitable candidates in the first place and AI can also help manage communications with candidates – by setting up interview times, for example.


With 250 applications for each corporate job on average, it’s understandable that companies are looking at ways to ease the burden of selection through automation in hope of finding the right talent and finding it quickly.



The downsides of AI


But there is a catch. Oftentimes, automated assessments are poorly conceived and in principle do little more than just push the work of filtering candidates off the recruiters onto the candidates themselves. This adds to candidates’ sense of exasperation.


They are often faced with questions such as “Do you prefer to work in a team rather than alone”. These questions, without knowing the full context, make little sense as an individual is likely to enjoy doing both at different times.


Another potential downside of AI is that it is mostly trained on historic data. This can have important implications for people wanting to change the direction of their careers. The algorithms feast on past experience and could pigeon-hole candidates each time they seek new roles – trapping them into conventional career pathways.

Photo by Franki Chamaki on Unsplash

Moreover, in recent years, it has become evident that badly designed AI processes can lead to unfair treatment and bias. Unless checked against it, the software reflects the biases of those programming it, or data it learns from.


For instance, Amazon famously pulled the plug on AI recruitment software in 2018 after it started to show gender bias. A preponderance of masculine résumés had skewed the software to penalise the use the words like “women’s” – as in “women’s chess club captain.”



Friend or Foe?


The AI-powered recruitment process has both advantages to build on and potential pitfalls to avoid. And while many debates focus on answering the binary question of whether or not AI should be used in recruitment to begin with, perhaps the main focus should instead be placed on how to make use of it so that it benefits both businesses and candidates.


The learnings from the examples above suggest that AI, if left unsupervised or badly designed, can veer off the rails. AI developers themselves, such as Sylvain Duranton, readily acknowledge this and therefore advocate close collaboration between humans and AI.


This mirrors a similar debate in robotics. Industry increasingly looks to close interaction between humans and robots in the workplace rather than the latter simply replacing the former.

Photo by Rock’n Roll Monkey on Unsplash

If this model of collaboration is adopted, it will help limit the disadvantages, while accentuating the benefits of AI in the recruitment process. Times are changing fast. Instead of reflecting gender bias, new AI from LinkedIn is specifically aimed at helping recruiters overcome it. Meanwhile the latest generation of recruitment services like Vettery blend automation with the human touch.


With careful implementation, and a human dimension, AI can mature to be a positive force for employers and job seekers alike.

Related

News and Research

10 Key Trends That Will Change the Way We Work in the 2020s

As a decade closes, it's natural to look ahead to what the next one might hold. What will the world of work look like in the coming decade?

30 December 2019

FUTURE OF WORK

6 Microsoft Teams Tricks To Improve Your Mental Well-being While Working Remotely

You can burn the candle at both ends, but what happens when you run out of wax in the middle? I wanted to share some of my learnings on how to change your digital and home working habits.

24 November 2020

COVID19 , FUTURE OF WORK

6 Ways COVID-19 Is Accelerating The Future Of Work

The COVID-19 pandemic has forced businesses to radically change the way they operate. The changes we make during the crisis might become permanent shifts in how we work.

31 March 2020